- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43693 RSA No. 56 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 56 OF 2016 (SP) BETWEEN: KUM NARAYANAMMA V D/O LATE SRI.VENKATARAMANARAJU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT CHAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK- 563 130. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. P.S.JAGADISH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. P B RAJU., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI V SIDDARAJU S/O VENKATAGIRIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT MALIYAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK- 563 130. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VENKATESHA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.M.LOKESH, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.10.2015 PASSED IN RA.NO.31/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. DISTRICT JUDGE, KOLAR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.07.2014 PASSED IN OS.NO.592/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC MALUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43693 RSA No. 56 of 2016 CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL JUDGMENT Both counsel present. 2. It appears that the matter was referred to the Karnataka Mediation Centre and the same was settled before the Mediation Centre on 17.10.2025. The Mediation Report reads as follows: "III. The present appeal is preferred against the same challenging the said Order, has been referred to mediation to enable the parties to the dispute to explore possibilities of settlement. In the course of mediation, the parties have resolved their dispute and have agreed to resolve the dispute between them amicably on the following terms and conditions:- 1. The parties hereby agree that the respondent/defendant, in full and final settlement of all the appellant/plaintiffs claim shall give her a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Fifty Thousand only) by way of DD No.759202 dated 30.09.2025 drawn on Kotak Mahindra Bank, Brookfield Branch, Bengaluru in favour of Kum. Narayanamma.V. The said DD will be handed over to the appellant/plaintiffs by the respondent/defendant at the time of reporting settlement before this Hon'ble Court. 2. Both the parties agree that on receipt of the said DD by the appellant/plaintiff, all her claims as against the respondent/defendant - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43693 RSA No. 56 of 2016 stand satisfied. Further, any interest, right or claim of the appellant/plaintiff in respect of the suit schedule property bearing Sy.No.161 measuring 1 acre 38 guntas situated at Malliyappanahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Malur Taluk stands obliterated. The agreement of sale agreement dated 12.10.2009 executed in favour of the appellant/plaintiff stands cancelled. 3. The parties agree that as a consequence of this settlement arrived at in mediation, both parties have no further claims as against each other 4. The appellant is entitled to refund of Court fee". 3. In view of the Mediation Report, this Regular Second Appeal is disposed of. 4. Registry is directed to return the Court fee deposited before this Court by the appellant in accordance with law. 5. The Registry is directed to return back the Trial Court records forthwith. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4