Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41198 (CHH)

MOHINDAR KAUSHIK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2878/2024 · 2025-03-04

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:10611 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2878 of 2024 1 - Mohindar Kaushik S/o Radhey Shyam Kaushik Aged About 40 Years R/o House No. 243 A. New Bhatan Gali, Bhavani Thakur Balwant Singh Gali, District Bhivani, Haryana. (Applicant No. 1 In Cra/18/2024) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Station House Officer Police Station Supela, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector(District Magistrate) District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Pashupati D.C. S/o Lt. Vishnu Bahadur D.C. Aged About 38 Years R/o Dharmavati, Ward No. -03, Vijwar Chowki, Pyuthan, Nepal 5 - Virendra Singh S/o Rajkumar Aged About 34 Years R/o House No. 509, Village- Dayal Singh Colony, Hansi, District Hisar, Haryana. (Applicant No. 5 In Cra/18/2024) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sunita Manikpuri, Dy. G.A. 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 04.03.2025 1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he wants to withdraw the instant petition with a direction to revisional Court to decide the applications (Annexure P/5 and Annexure P/6) within the stipulated period as fixed by this Court. 2. No objection raised from the other side. 3. In view of the above submissions made by both the counsel for the parties, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to the Court concerned to decide the pending applications of the petitioner Annexure P/5 and Annexure P/6 within the period of three months form today. Certified Copy as per rules. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Saxena