Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41193 (JHR)

KANHAI PAHARIYA @ KISHAN KUMAR SARDAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7464/2025 · 2025-12-22

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:38614] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7464 of 2025 Kanhai Pahariya @ Kishan Kumar Sardar, age about 32 years, s/o Dilu Pahariya @ Dilip Sardar r/o village Kurapara, P.O. Pakur, P.S. Pakur(T), District-Pakur (Jharkhand). ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Yasir Arafat, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 04/ 22.12.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the alleged occurrence is of 05.03.2025, wherein the FIR was registered on 11.03.2025. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to co-operate in the investigation. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that there is direct allegation against the petitioner. She next submits that the ring finger of the informant was cut in the assault made by the petitioner and further the allegation of snatching the amount is also there against the petitioner. 5. Considering that the allegation of snatching the amount and [2025:JHHC:38614] -2- further there is direct allegation against the petitioner of assault, pursuant to that the ring finger of the informant was cut, I am not inclined to provide the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-22.12.2025 Amitesh/-