Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41193 (AP)

MARUTHI ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LIMITED v. ALURI LALITHA

CRP/3305/2025 · 2025-12-04

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010599132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION Between: 1. MARUTHI ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, YADLA SURYA DEEP, 1 FLOOR. BESIDE K.C.HIGH SCHOOL, PARDHA SARADHI STREET, VIDHYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. 2. YADLA SURYA DEEP YEARS, R/O. 1-3/26 PARDHA SARADHI STREET, VIDHYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. 1. ALURI LALITHA, W/o Aluri Venkata Satya Sai Kiran Hindu, 39 years, D.No, 12-14 12-14-32, Poornandampet, Vijayawada, NTR District. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the Orde E.P.No.20/2023 in O.S.No.408 of 2016 on the file of VIII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada by allowing the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.20/2023 in O.S.No.408 of IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3305/2025 MARUTHI ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, YADLA SURYA DEEP, 1 FLOOR. BESIDE K.C.HIGH SCHOOL, PARDHA SARADHI STREET, VIDHYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. YADLA SURYA DEEP,, S/O, RAJENDRA PRASAD, HINDU, 39 3/26-13/8, 1 FLOOR. BESIDE K.C.HIGH SCHOOL, PARDHA SARADHI STREET, VIDHYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND ALURI LALITHA, W/o Aluri Venkata Satya Sai Kiran Hindu, 39 years, 32, Poornandampet, Vijayawada, NTR District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the Order dt. 17-09-2025 passed in E.P.No.20/2023 in O.S.No.408 of 2016 on the file of VIII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada by allowing the same and pass Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated davit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.20/2023 in O.S.No.408 of IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3163] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY MARUTHI ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, YADLA SURYA DEEP, 1-3/26-13/8, 1 FLOOR. BESIDE K.C.HIGH SCHOOL, PARDHA SARADHI STREET, ,, S/O, RAJENDRA PRASAD, HINDU, 39 13/8, 1 FLOOR. BESIDE K.C.HIGH SCHOOL, PARDHA SARADHI STREET, VIDHYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER(S) ALURI LALITHA, W/o Aluri Venkata Satya Sai Kiran Hindu, 39 years, 32, Poornandampet, Vijayawada, NTR District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be 2025 passed in E.P.No.20/2023 in O.S.No.408 of 2016 on the file of VIII Additional District Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated davit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P.No.20/2023 in O.S.No.408 of 2 CMR,J C.R.P.No.3305 of 2025 2016 on the file of VIII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada until disposal of the main C.R.P and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHIRANJEEVI TANIKONDA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 3 CMR,J C.R.P.No.3305 of 2025 The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the revision petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the civil revision petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY Date: 05.12.2025 MDP