IN T 210 Arya Prat Bhawan, D Singh Shar Jintender K others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU order dated Court in L Haryana and observation COCP-1508-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1508 of Date of decision : Pratinidhi Sabha Haryana (Regd an, Dayanand Math, Gohana Road, R Sharma Versus nder Kumar, IAS, Director Secondar AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate w Mr. Tej Kanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 12.9.2013 (Annexure P-1) passed in LPA-578-2011 titled as “Arya Pr na and others”, whereby the LPA was d vations :- “….The learned Single Ju passing the impugned ord that there could not be an elections as prayed for b orders passed in the Let the moot point was w appellant society read w envisage the election p nomination of certain committees of different in 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 508 of 2025 (O & M) sion :-08.01.2026 (Regd.) Jagdev Singh Sidhanti oad, Rohtak through Shri Umed …..Petitioner ondaryn Education Haryana and …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate with . A.G., Haryana. has been filed alleging violation of passed by a Division Bench of this rya Pratinidhi Sabha vs. State of was disposed of with the following le Judge in the present case while order dated 22.03.2011 has held e any direction issued not to hold or by the appellant in view of the Letters Patent Appeal, however, s whether the bye-laws of the with the said rules necessarily on process or could there be ain members to the managing nt institutions. We find that such a VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.09 17.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document that the L respondents restored the said fact an whereby th 02.12.2025 for the petit parties, the p January 08 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-1508-2025 (O & M) nomination is envisaged clearly and bye-laws of provides for the same. We may, howev nomination has to be as p and we clarify at the requ respondents that in terms the members of the M generally be upto 11 w more…..” At the very outset, learned coun the LPA order dated 12.9.2013 sta ndents have withdrawn the orders (An ed the possession to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respon fact and handed over a copy of Speak by the needful has been done. Co .2025 is taken on record. Copy thereof i e petitioner. Heard. In view of the submissions mad s, the present contempt petition has been Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh ry 08, 2026 Asija r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 ged in the said Rules itself very s of the appellant society also owever, clarify that such a as per the bye-laws of the society request of learned counsel for the rms of Clause (a) of bye-law 32.3 e Managing Committee should 11 which could be 15 but no d counsel for the petitioner submits 3 stands complied with as the rs (Annexures P-23 to P-25) and respondents-State also affirms the Speaking Order dated 02.12.2025, Copy of the said order dated ereof is supplied to learned counsel s made by learned counsel for the s been disposed of. any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.09 17.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document