APHC010685362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35650/2025 Between: 1. URLAKA ARUDRAMMA, W/O RAMMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-12, MAIN VEEDHI, JUMBIRI VILLAGE, KURAPAM MANDAL, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM (VIZIANAGARAM) DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PARVATHIPURAM MANYARN (VIZIANAGARAM) DISTRICT, PARVATHIPURAM. 3 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PARVATHIPURAM DIVISION, A PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM (VIZIANAGARAM) DISTRICT. 4. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KURAPAM MANDAL, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM (VIZIANAGARAM) DISTRICT. 535 5. 5. ADDAKULA SEETHANNA, S/O APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O DHARMALAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, KURAPAM MANDAL, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM (VIZIANAGARAM) DISTRICT, 6. MAJJI GANAPATHI, S/O KURMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O DHARMALAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, KURAPAM MANDAL, 2 PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM (VIZIANAGARAM) DISTRICT. 7. 7. PALIKA ADDI, S/O DASARADHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O DHARMALAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, KURAPAM MANDAL, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM (VIZIANAGARAM) DISTRICT. 8.. 8. ADDAKULA AYODHYA, S/O RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O DHARMALAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, KURAPAM MANDAL, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM (VIZIANAGARAM) DISTRICT 9. 9. ADDAKULA BIGESH, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O DHARMALAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, KURAPAM MANDAL, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM (VIZIANAGARAM) DISTRICT, 10.T 10. ADDAKULA MANMADA RAO, S/O RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O DHARMALAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, KURAPAM MANDAL, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM (VIZIANAGARAM) DISTRIC ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in attempting to dispossess the Petitioner from her absolute property for an extent of Ac.4-55 cents, out of which, Ac.3-05 cents is situated in Survey No.88/1, Ac.1-50 cents is situated in Survey N0.I/IB of Neelakantapuram Village, Kurapam Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam (Vizianagaram) District without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19, 21 and more particularly property right guaranteed under Article 300-A of Constitution and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of her absolute property for an extent of Ac.4-55 cents, out of which, Ac.3-05 cents is situated in Survey No.88/1, Ac.1-50 cents is situated in Survey N0.I/IB of Neelakantapuram Village, Kurapam Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam (Vizianagaram) District without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of her absolute property for an extent of Ac.4-55 3 cents, out of which, Ac.3-05 cents is situated in Survey No.88/1, Ac. 1-50 cents is situated in Survey No.l/IB of Neelakantapuram Village, Kurapam Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam (Vizianagaram) District without following due process of law till disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass s Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 4 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in attempting to dispossess the Petitioner from her absolute property for an extent of Ac.4-55 cents, out of which, Ac.3-05 cents is situated in Survey No.88/1, Ac.1-50 cents is situated in Survey No.1/IB of Neelakantapuram Village, Kurapam Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam (Vizianagaram) District, without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19, 21 and more particularly property right guaranteed under Article 300-A of Constitution and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of her absolute property for an extent of Ac.4-55 cents, out of which, Ac.3-05 cents is situated in Survey No.88/1, Ac.1-50 cents is situated in Survey No.1/IB of Neelakantapuram Village, Kurapam Mandal, Parvathipuram Manyam (Vizianagaram) District, without following due process of law and pass…” (in verbatim) 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. On a perusal of the relief sought as well as the complaint made before the District Collector, it is evident that the dispute is essentially between 5 private parties. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. 4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader has submitted that the Respondents are not interfering with the subject property. 5. In view of the above submission and considering the nature of dispute, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 23.12.2025 SNI 6 109 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35650 OF 2025 Dt.23.12.2025 SNI