Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41187 (RAJ)

KUMARI VARSHA PAHADIYA @ NAINA D/O SHRI RAMBABU PAHADIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/669/2025 · 2025-01-31

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4488] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 669/2025 1. Kumari Varsha Pahadiya @ Naina D/o Shri Rambabu Pahadiya, R/o Village Samor, Police Station Diholi, District Dholpur (Raj). Currently Residing At Near Shrinath Iti Collage, Luhari, Police Station Kotwali, District Dholpur (Raj) (At Present Petitioner Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). 2. Smt. Sunita W/o Shri Rambabu Pahadiya, R/o Village Samor, Police Station Diholi, District Dholpur (Raj). Currently Residing At Near Shrinath Iti Collage, Luhari, Police Station Kotwali, District Dholpur (Raj) (At Present Petitioner Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Public Prosecutor Mr. Ramu Dubey for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2025 1. The instant 2nd bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.463/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur for the offences under Sections 308(2), 351(2) and 61(1)(a) of the BNS. 2. First bail application of the petitioners bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.14056/2024 was dismissed as withdrawn [2025:RJ-JP:4488] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-669/2025] by this Court vide order dated 10.12.2024 with liberty to file fresh bail application after filing of the challan. 3. Heard. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the allegations against the accused- petitioners and more particularly the fact that the accused- petitioners are women and they are in custody since 24.10.2024 and the Police after completion of investigation has filed charge- sheet, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, this 2nd bail application under Section 483 of the BNS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above in connection with the aforesaid FIR shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /413