MOHD MURTAZA AND ANOTHER TH JAVID IQBAL v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(Crl)/45/2025 · 2025-08-05
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4118 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4118 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(Crl) No. 45/2025 CM No. 4790/2025
Mohd. Murtaza and Anr.
..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Rishabh Vaid, Advocate vice Mr. I.H. Bhat, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :-
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 05.08.2025
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file fresh petition, as there are certain deficiencies in filing the same. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 05.08.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 123 Mihul Singh 2025.08.05 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document