Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41166 (CHH)

MANISH KUMAR THAWAREY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10132/2025 · 2025-08-28

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:43870 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10132 of 2025 1 - Manish Kumar Thawarey S/o Lakhan Lal Thawarey, Aged About 48 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (Lb) At Govt. H.S. School Garhbengal, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 2 - Nirbhay Ram Sahu S/o Ubhay Ram Sahu, Aged About 56 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (Lb) At Govt. H.S. School Garhbengal, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 3 - Bawa Ram Arya S/o Arjun Ram Arya, Aged About 43 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (Lb) At Govt. H.S. School Garhbengal, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Shashikala Kashyap W/o Rajesh Kumar Kashyap, Aged About 44 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (Lb) At Govt. H.S. School Garhbengal, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 5 - Deepa Ghote W/o Prabhakar Ghote, Aged About 57 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (Lb) At Govt. H.S. School Garhbengal, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Arti Xalxo W/o Vincent Xalxo, Aged About 39 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (Lb) At Govt. H.S. School Garhbengal, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 7 - Nikesh Kumar Bhuarya S/o Babu Lal Bhuarya, Aged About 37 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (Lb) At Govt. H.S. School Garhbengal, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 8 - Jahotin Arya D/o Kartik Ram, Aged About 35 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) At Govt. Primary School Duggabengal, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 9 - Smt. Renuka Thawarey W/o Manish Kumar Thawarey, Aged About 42 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Bawdi, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 10 - Ku. Alpana Thawarey D/o Lakhan Lal Thawarey, Aged About 49 Years Posted ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.08.30 12:11:50 +0530 2 And Working As Lecturer (Lb) At Govt. Upper Primary School Bagdongri, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 11 - Smt. Nisha Turker W/o Siddharth Turker, Aged About 45 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Mardel, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 12 - Pushpa Sahare D/o Jaisingh Sahare, Aged About 50 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Temrugaon, Block Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 13 - Motilal Usendi S/o Sulee Ram Usendi, Aged About 49 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (Lb) At Govt. Middle School Aader, Block Orchha, District Narayanpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer, Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 5 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer, Block Narayanpur, District Mohla Narayanpur (C.G.) 7 - Block Education Officer, Block Orchha, District Mohla- Narayanpur (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Narayanpur, District Narayanpur (C.G.) 9 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Orchha, District Narayanpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 29/08/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking direction towards the 3 respondent authorities for grant of Krmonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the order dated 28-02-2024 passed by the Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 and also as per circular dated 10-03-2017 issued by the State Government of C.G. 2. The claim of the petitioners is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023, has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make their representation to the competent authority in light of order dated 28/02/2024 passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 5. Against the order passed in WA No.261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court bearing SLP(C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated 17-03-2025. 6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make their representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and 4 judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation(s) being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such representation(s). It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok