[2025:RJ-JP:47274] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17658/2025 1. Umesh Chand Son Of Shri Bhagwan Sahay, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Village Berroo Nagar, Bharatpur, District Bharatpur (Raj.). Presently Posted As Constable Band, Belt No. 1584, Reserve Police Line Alwar. 2. Ram Babu Son Of Shri Panna Lal Yadav, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Village Choroti Estmurar Post Khunteta Kalan, District Alwar (Raj.). Presently Posted As Constable Band, Belt No. 1580, Reserve Police Line Alwar. 3. Dhara Singh Yadav Son Of Shri Chhote Lal Yadav, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Panna Ka Kua, Vivekanand Nagar, Sector-4, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.). Presently Posted As Constable Band, Belt No. 1581, Reserve Police Line Alwar. 4. Dharmendra Kumar Son Of Shri Shambhu Dayal, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 25, Ram Nagar, Behind Neb, Alwar, District Bharatpur (Raj.). Presently Posted As Constable Band, Belt No. 1583, Reserve Police Line Alwar. 5. Rajendra Prasad Sonwal Son Of Shri Kajod Mal, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 30, Mejar Kanwal Singh Nagar, Fej-1, Chor Dungri, Tehsil And District Alwar (Raj.). Presently Posted As Constable Band, Belt No. 1585, Reserve Police Line Alwar. 6. Gopal Singh Son Of Shri Ram Charan, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Village Badka, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar (Raj.). Presently Posted As Constable Band, Belt No. 1586, Reserve Police Line Alwar. 7. Rajesh Kumar Son Of Shri Ratti Ram, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Village Khudanpuri, District Alwar (Raj.). Presently Posted As Constable Band, Belt No. 1579, Reserve Police Line Alwar. 8. Ami Chand Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Mohalla Badh Dhundhla, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, At Present District Kotputali Behror (Raj.). Presently Posted As Head Constable Mounted, Belt No. 1502, Reserve Police Line Alwar. 9. Madan Lal Son Of Shri Chet Ram, Aged About 47 Years, [2025:RJ-JP:47274] (2 of 3) [CW-17658/2025] Resident Of Village Gandhi Nagar (Ghari), Post Shyopur, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar, At Present District Kherthal Tijara (Raj.). Presently Posted As Head Constable Mounted, Belt No. 1504, Reserve Police Line Alwar. 10. Rajveer Singh Son Of Shri Roop Ram, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Village Majara Kath, Post Neemrana, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, At Present District Kotputali Behror (Raj.). Presently Posted As Head Constable Mounted, Belt No. 1503, Reserve Police Line Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Finance (Rules), Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Secretary (Home), Ministry Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur, (Raj.). 3. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur, (Raj.). 4. Superintendent Of Police, Alwar (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners in relation to a matter of financial loss due to non grant of benefit of second and third selection scale (Technical) and fixation of salary in the Rajasthan Civil Services (revised Pay) Rules, 2008. [2025:RJ-JP:47274] (3 of 3) [CW-17658/2025] 2. Considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners as well learned counsel for State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the controversy and issue raised by petitioners herein is already settled by order dated 28.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12949/2025 titled as Ravindra Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. He also submits that the matter is squarely covered by the controversy already set off to rest by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Amar Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors, in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3873/2019 order dated 20.12.2023. 4. In view of above, where both the counsels agreed that the issue involved in the instant writ petition is covered by the aforesaid judgments, therefore, the instant writ petition is allowed in terms of judgment in case of Amar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra) with the direction that the relief granted by this court in the case of Amar Singh (supra) shall also be extended to the petitioner in the instant writ petition, but after examination of their case, about applicability of ratio. 5. Instant writ petition and pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /100