Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41154 (BOM)

SMT. SHRIMANTABAI DANGONDA PATIL v. RUDRAGONDA B. PATIL(DEDEASED) THR. LRS. AND ORS

IA/1/2025 · 2025-01-09

Gauri Godse

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

37.1.25 ia.docx Iresh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2025 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER ST NO. 20522 OF 2024 Smt. Shrimantabai Dangonda Patil .....Applicant Vs. Rudragonda B. Patil .....Respondents (Deceased) Thr. LRs and ors Mr. D. B. Patil for the applicant CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 17th JANUARY 2025 ORDER: 1. Though this appeal was disposed of on 9th January 2025, it was directed to be listed at the request of learned counsel for the appellant. The appeal was directed to be listed as the learned counsel for the appellant had submitted that in view of some decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court, the appeal would have been maintainable. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant today submits that the appeal would not be maintainable against the impugned order. Hence, the original order of 9th January 2025 remains unaltered. 1/2 IRESH MASHAL Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2025.01.18 16:54:30 +0530 37.1.25 ia.docx 3. However, it is clarified that the appellant would be entitled to seek benefit of pendency of this appeal for seeking condonation of delay, if any, in filing the appropriate proceedings. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2