Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41148 (RAJ)

DR. CHAYANK PAREEK S/O SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR PAREEK v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19935/2023 · 2025-01-24

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3570] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19935/2023 Dr. Chayank Pareek S/o Shri Sushil Kumar Pareek, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 121, Pareek Mohalla, Village And Post Sirsi Jaipur- 302012 (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Dy. Secretary To Govt., Medical And Health (Group-2) Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Director, (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Directorate, Swasthya Bhavan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. The Additional Director (Gazetted), Medical And Health Services Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. National Board Of Exeamination In Medical Sciences (Nbems), Neet Pg-2023, Medical Enclave, Ansari Nagar Mahatma Gandhi Marg (Ring Road) New Delhi- 110029 (Through Its Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.K. Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Shukla HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 24/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the controversy in hand is no more res integra. Further, learned counsel has relied upon the dictum encapsulated in SBCWP No. 13978/2022 titled as Dr. Ravi Pratap Udawat vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. [2025:RJ-JP:3570] (2 of 2) [CW-19935/2023] It is further submitted that the facts and legal issue of the instant controversy are akin to the afore-relied ratio. Hence, the same ratio be made applicable herein. Learned counsel for the respondents has not controverted the said fact. In the light of above, the present petition is disposed of in view of the judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of Dr. Ravi Pratap Udawat (supra), the directions spelled out therein be made applicable in the matter in hand. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA /267