APHC010606422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31576/2025 Between: 1. YARRAGUDI RAMA MOHAN REDDY, S/O. BAYYA REDDY,AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O.439, YERRAGUDIVARIPALLE, NADIMIKANDRIGA VILLAGE GURRAMKONDA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH. (PRESENTLY ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAYACHOTI DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.(PRESENTLY ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT). 3. THE REVENUE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RAYACHOTI DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.(PRESENTLY ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT). 4. 4. THE TAHILSDAR, GURRAMKONDA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH. (PRESENTLY ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT). 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, PAMULURIVARIPALLI VILLAGE, GURRAMKONDA MANDAL,CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.(PRESENTLY ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT). 6. P MAIN REDDY, S/O. LATE P. CHINNAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. 7. P CHINNAPA REDDY CHAKAPA, . S/O. LATE CHINNAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. (THE RESPONDENTS NO.6 7 ARE 2 R/O.YERRAGUDIVARIPALLE, NADIMIKANDRIGA VILLAGE,GURRAMKONDA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH. (PRESENTLY ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT)) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representations dated 29.09.2025, made by the petitioner, not to interfere over my land to an extent of 0.75 Cents in Survey No. 647/G of Pamulurivaripalli Village, Gurramkonda Mandal, and trying to dispossess me from the said land without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, non-application of mind and colorable exercise of power, apart from being violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the Respondents not to interfere with the petitioner property in Sy.No. 646/G to an extent of 0.75 cents of Pamulurivaripalli Village, Gurramkonda Mandal, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass s IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to DIRECT the respondent to consider the representation, dated: 29.09.2025, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SINGARAJU MAHASWETHA VARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31576 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following relief:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dated 29.09.2025 made by the petitioner not to interfere over his land to an extent of Ac.0.75 cents in Sy.No.647/G of Pamulurivaripalli village, Gurramkonda Mandal and trying to dispossess the petitioner from the said land without following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary”. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. The present Writ Petition is filed for non consideration of the representation made by the petitioner dated 29.09.2025. 4. On verification of the said representation, the very grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent Nos.6 and 7 are interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the subject land. In fact, the petitioner has filed F-line application and when the said application was not considered the petitioner has filed a writ petition vide W.P.No.20137 of 2024. The said Writ Petition was disposed of on 12.09.2024 directing the respondent authorities to conduct survey and fix boundaries. Pursuant to the said orders, the respondent 4 authorities have conducted survey and also issued an endorsement on 21.12.2024 to that effect. In fact, in the said endorsement it is held that if the petitioner has any grievance with the adjacent land owners, he will approach the Civil Court. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain the grievance of the petitioner as the issue involved in this petition is civil in nature. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Civil Court for remedies against the respondent Nos.6 and 7. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt:14.11.2025 sj 5 120 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31576 of 2025 14.11.2025 ssjj