Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41145 (AP)

UPPADA APPALA REDDY v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25645/2023 · 2025-12-09

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010495342023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. UPPADA APPALA REDDY, S/O LATE PHAKEER, AGED. 37 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O AMPALAM VILLAGE , MAIN ROAD DOOR NO. 0-00, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULM DISTRICT. 2. PINNINTI NOOKARAJU,, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O AMPALAM VILLAGE , DOOR NO. 1 REDDIKA STREET , POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULM DISTRICT. 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHYATRAJ SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRI 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHYAT OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. KOTTAREVU GRAMA PANCHYAT, REP BY IT'S THE PANCHYAT SECRATARY AKKUVARAM VILLAGE, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKUALAM DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25645/2023 UPPADA APPALA REDDY, S/O LATE PHAKEER, AGED. 37 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O AMPALAM VILLAGE , MAIN ROAD DOOR 00, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULM DISTRICT. PINNINTI NOOKARAJU,, S/O LATE APPAIAH, AGED. 48 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O AMPALAM VILLAGE , DOOR NO. 1 REDDIKA STREET , POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHYATRAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRI THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM THE DISTRICT PANCHYAT OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM THE TAHSILDAR, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. KOTTAREVU GRAMA PANCHYAT, REP BY IT'S THE PANCHYAT SECRATARY AKKUVARAM VILLAGE, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKUALAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI UPPADA APPALA REDDY, S/O LATE PHAKEER, AGED. 37 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O AMPALAM VILLAGE , MAIN ROAD DOOR S/O LATE APPAIAH, AGED. 48 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O AMPALAM VILLAGE , DOOR NO. 1-53, REDDIKA STREET , POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRI THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM THE DISTRICT PANCHYAT OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM THE TAHSILDAR, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. KOTTAREVU GRAMA PANCHYAT, REP BY IT'S THE PANCHYAT SECRATARY AKKUVARAM VILLAGE, POLAKI MANDAL, ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction mostly one which is in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 5th has issued the impugned notice vide Rc.5/2023, dt 24.07.2023 in Sy No. 341-1 an extent of Ac. 2.23 cents part of Ac.14.75 cents situated in Dandugopalapuram Grama Panchyat, and polaki Mandal of Srikakulam district as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, and contrary to law and violations of principals of Natural Justice, without any authority or Jurisdiction, and offends the rights of the petitioner under Article 300-A ,14, 21, of Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the above said land in Sy No. 341-1 of land an extent of Ac.2.23 cents, situated in Dandugopalapuram Grama Panchyat, and Polaki Mandal of Srikakulam district, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from their subjected land In Sy.No. 341-1, land an extent of Ac.2.23 cents, situated in Dandugopalapuram Grama Panchyat, and polaki Mandal of Srikakulam district and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. UMASANKAR LOKANADHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) 3 The Court made the following order: Ms M.Gayatri, learned counsel, representing Sri Umasankar Lokanadham, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 10.12.2025 MP 4 130 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:25645 of 2023 Date: 10.12.2025 MP