M/S VINEET SINGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/4629/2025 · 2025-08-31
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41143 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41143 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:44183-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4629 of 2025 M/s Vineet Singh Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. Class (A), Through Its Managing Director, Vineet Singh, S/o. Late Sudhish Singh, Aged About 51 Years, Near Rajiv Gandhi Chowk, Om Nagar, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan, P.S.- Rakhi, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Superintending Engineer Water Resource Department, Shivnath, Distt.- Durg, Durg (C.G.) 3 - Executive Engineer Kharkhara Mohadipat Project Division, Water Resources, Department, Distt.- Durg, Durg (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.09.01 16:49:50 +0530
2 For Petitioner(s) : Shri Vivek Verma, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Shri Prafull N. Bharat, Advocate General with Shri Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.
Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru,
Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
01.09.2025
1. The present WPC has been filed with the following prayer:- 10.1 To call for the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner from the respondents. 10.2 That the Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to release the pending bill/undisputed Amount Rs. 6,40,100/- of petitioner within stipulated time period with interest from the date of submission of bill before the respondent authorities till the actual realization. 10.3 Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon'ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.
3
2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to law, as may be available to him, besides the filing of the writ petition.
3. Accordingly, this WPCR is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated supra. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Shoaib