1 2025:CGHC:43517 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4587 of 2025 1 - Vedkumari Bhardwaj W/o Pawankumar Bhardwaj Aged About 29 Years R/o Village- Urga, Police Station- Urga, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Tehsildar Shivrinarayan District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priya Kaiwart, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. A.G. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 28/08/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following relief: “10.1. That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the case no. bearing 202411062700067/B-125/2024-25 under RBC 6-4 is pending before the Tehsildar, Sheorinarayan, District- Janjgir-Champa 2 (C.G.) within stipulated time period. 10.2 That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and necessary in the interest of justice may kindly be awarded.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a direction to the Collector to decide the application made by the petitioner expeditiously within a time frame. 3. Learned State Counsel opposed the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 5. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of the counsels, Collector, Janjgir-Champa is directed to decide the application of the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law, rules and regulations, expeditiously, as soon as possible, after giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the objectors. 6. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima