Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41129 (RAJ)

PRIYANKA INDORIYA D/O BABULAL INDORIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7836/2025 · 2025-10-10

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41255] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7836/2025 Priyanka Indoriya D/o Babulal Indoriya, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 27, Riico Industrial Area, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA & Mr. Anirudh Singh Mr. Manish Kumawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 10/10/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0324/2024 registered at Police Station Jawahar Nagar District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that there are no criminal antecedents pending against the accused-applicant. It is submitted that dispute pertains to a partnership firm wherein, complainant was also one of the partners. It is further submitted that instant matter has civil flavor and the co-accused has already been granted interim protection vide order dated 07.11.2024 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 7349/2024 titled as Jatin Chabra Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. [2025:RJ-JP:41255] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7836/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application and have submitted that fraud has been committed and there are chances qua the siphoning of the amount in question. 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, perusal of the record and taking note of the fact that the applicant is a young man with no criminal antecedents registered against him; that the co-accused have already been granted benefit by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.11.2024; and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to allow the anticipatory bail application subject to a condition that applicant shall join the investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer concerned on 17.10.2025 at or around 11.00 a.m. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Jawahar Nagar District Jaipur City (East) in F.I.R. No. 0324/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Priyanka Indoriya D/o Babulal Indoriya, she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicant shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; and if the applicant fails to join and render due cooperation in the investigation or does not mark appearance before the concerned [2025:RJ-JP:41255] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7836/2025] authority, as directed hereinabove, the present order allowing anticipatory bail to the applicant shall cease to operate; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/144