Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41126 (AP)

Eillipilli Somulamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/28178/2025 · 2025-12-09

D Ramesh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010541522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 28178/2025 Between: 1. EILLIPILLI SOMULAMMA, W/O. SIMHACHALAM, AGED 53 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO.1-88, NAGARAPPALEM, TARLUVADA, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AT VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BHEEMUNIPATNAM REVENUE DIVISION, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE THASILDAR, , ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANDAPURAM POLICE STATION, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly the respondents 4 and 5 at the instance of the local political leaders in insisting petitioner to vacate from her house site property bearing plot No. 40 admeasuring 90 Sq.yards covered by Sy.No.276 of Anandapuram Revenue Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without there being any authority or sanction of law and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners possession over the said house site property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioner’s possession over the house site property bearing plot No. 40 admeasuring 90 Sq.yards covered by Sy.No. 276 of Anandapuram Revenue Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District nor grant assignment patta to any third parties, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANANDA KUMAR VEJANDLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: During the course of hearing, it is observed by the Court that the Writ Petition is filed without mentioning proper fact and not impleading the effected party as respondents. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However the petitioner is at liberty to file Writ Petition afresh by showing the effected parties as respondents. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 10.12.2025 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.28178 OF 2025 10.12.2025 RD