Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41125 (AP)

V MALLAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/21030/2025 · 2025-10-27

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010406172025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 21030/2025 Between: 1. V MALLAIAH, S/O. KISTANNA, AGED. 67 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.91/435- 5-1-7, UMAR NAGAR, BESIDES SANTOSH NAGAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A. P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT, R AND B DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAWATHI, VELAGAPUDI, KRISHNA DIST, AP. 2. THE A.P.S.R.T.C, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, PNBS, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP. 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER/DPTO, A.P.S.R.T.C., KURNOOL REGION, AT KURNOOL, KURNOOL DIST., AP. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri S.M. Subhan, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri A. Rama Rao, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC. 2. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner that during the pendency of the present Writ Petition, the subject stall has been allotted to someone else, and the Writ Petitioner has challenged the said allotment made in favour of the third party. 3. In this view of the matter, the present Writ Petition is closed with liberty to the Writ Petitioner to proceed with the Writ Petition which is already filed. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:28.10.2025 Vns