[2025:RJ-JP:51381] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19478/2025 1. Ramkesh Meena S/o Shri Birdi Chand, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Kharkhada, Post Palwa, Tehsil Raini District Alwar, Hc Belt No. 500 2. Jaisingh Meena S/o Bholya Ram Meena, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Kachawa, District Alwar, Hc Belt No. 1307 3. Murari Lal S/o Angad Ram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Raini, District Alwar, Hc Belt No. 724 4. Bhajni Ram S/o Ramkaran, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Moti Ka Nagla, Dololi, District Alwar, Hc Belt No. 163 5. Vijay Singh Meena S/o Har Sahay Meena, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Achalpuri, District Alwar, Hc Belt No. 26 6. Hari Kishan S/o Rajpal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Buchpuri, Saloli, District Alwar, Hc Belt No. 1800 7. Kailash Chand Meena S/o Shri Babulal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Harsana, District Alwar, Hc Belt No. 662 8. Bhagchand S/o Shri Chuttan Lal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Vpo Bhuleri, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar, Hc Belt No, 405 9. Smt. Prem Meena W/o Mahesh Kumar D/o Bishambhar Dayal Meena, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 48, Police Family Quarters, Near Police Line, Alwar, Hc Belt No. 1483 10. Ramesh Chand Meena S/o Ramker Meena, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Kothari Ka Bass, Mala Khera, District Alwar, Hc Belt No. 1397 11. Hari Ram Meena S/o Jaldhari Meena, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Lachha Ka Bass, Pinan, District Alwar, Hc Belt No. 1815 12. Nand Kishore S/o Shri Mangtu Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Bawadi Ka, Post Baroda Mev, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar, Hc Belt No. 33 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter Rajasthan, [2025:RJ-JP:51381] (2 of 3) [CW-19478/2025] Lalkothi, Jaipur 3. Additional Director General Of Police, (Recruitment And Promotion Board), Police Head Quarter Rajasthan, Lalkothi, Jaipur 4. Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur Range, Jaipur, (Chairman, Selection Board), Rajasthan Jaipur 5. Superintendent Of Police, Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chand Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the the respondentsmay kindly be directed to give promotion to the petitioners Sub- Inspector on the post of Assistant against the category looking to their seniority with all consequential benefit.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 02.02.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 titled as Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. [2025:RJ-JP:51381] (3 of 3) [CW-19478/2025] 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /501