Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41120 (RAJ)

M/S PADAM CHAND VINAY CHAND JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13637/2020 · 2025-02-04

Avneesh Jhingan, Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4909-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13637/2020 M/s Padam Chand Vinay Chand Jain, Mahadeo Nagar, Nandpuri Near 22-Godam, Jaipur, A Partnership Firm Through Its Partner Shri Padam Chand Jain ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Government, Finance Department (Tax Division) Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Deputy Inspector General, Stamps And Registration, Ajmer 3. Assessing Authority Cum Sub Registrar, Dausa, District Dausa 4. Sub-Registrar, Nangal Rajavtan, District Dausa 5. Assistant Mining Engineer, Mines Department, Khan Bhakhari Road, Nangal Rajavtan, District Dausa ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Nitesh Pareek for Mr.Ajay Kumar Bajpai, Sr. Adv. For Respondent(s) : Kartikeya Sharma for Mr.Sandeep Taneja,AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 04/02/2025 AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.[ORAL]:- 1. This petition is filed seeking quashing of communication dated 26.06.2020 sent by the Sub Registrar Nangal Rajavtan, District Dausa to respondent No.2. 2. The grievance raised is that the communication is a direction to make recovery from the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:4909-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-13637/2020] 3. From perusal of the communication, it is evident that it is neither a recovery notice nor the order passed for creating a demand. It is merely a communication for respondent Nos.2 & 4 that two files have been received and the details have been mentioned therein. 4. No case is made out for interference in the writ jurisdiciton. 5. The petition is dismissed. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/sunita/22