Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 308 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.02.2025 IN CMC(P).NO.1/2024 IN RFA NO.23 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS: 1 RAJAN PILLAI, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O KRISHNA PILLAI, MANAGING PARTNER, BLUE PEARL, NEAR MANICODE TEMPLE, VAYYETTE, VENJARAMOOD, RESIDING AT CHOTHI, CHEMPOOR, MUDAKKAL. P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695103. 2 LATHA KUMARI @ LATHA, AGED 58 YEARS, W/O RAJAN PILLAI, PARTNER, BLUE PEARL, NEAR MANICODE TEMPLE, VAYYETTE, VENJARAMOOD, RESIDING AT CHOTHI, CHEMPOOR, MUDAKKAL. P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695103.
BY ADV M.HEMALATHA RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 RAMESAN, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O SIVASANKARAN, RESIDING AT KASMEERAM, THACHANKONAM, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN –
695141.
2025:KER:30642 R.P.No.308/ 2024 in CMCP.No.1/2024 in RFA..No23/2024 2 2 KAVITHA, AGED 56 YEARS, W/O RAMESAN, RESIDING AT KASMEERAM, THACHANKONAM, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695141. 3 AAKASH RAMESH, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O RAMESAN, RESIDING AT KASMEERAM, THACHANKONAM, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695141.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2025, THE COURT ON 07.04.2025 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:30642 R.P.No.308/ 2024 in CMCP.No.1/2024 in RFA..No23/2024 3 A. BADHARUDEEN, J. ================================ R.P.No.308 of 2025 in C.M.C(P).No.1 of 2024 in R.F.A.No.23 of 2024 ================================ Dated this the 7th day of April, 2025 O R D E R This is a petition filed by the petitioners in C.M.C(P).No.1/2024 in R.F.A.No.23/2024 to review the order dated 18.02.2025 in the above C.M.C(P).
2. Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner.
3. Though the learned counsel for the review petitioner attempted to point out error apparent on the face of the order warranting review, in fact, the learned counsel failed to substantiate any error apparent on the face of the record warranting review of the order.
2025:KER:30642 R.P.No.308/ 2024 in CMCP.No.1/2024 in RFA..No23/2024 4 Therefore, the Review Petition is found to be devoid of any merits and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE rtr/