APHC010587442025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11910/2025 Between: 1. KATI VINOD KUMAR,, S/O SUDHARSAN RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. RESIDENT OF D-BLOCK, T1, 3RD FLOOR, K.S. VYAS POLICE QUARTERS, LABBIPET, NEAR NETHAJI BRIDGE, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH-520010 2. KATI SESHA KUMARI, W/O SUDHARSAN RAO, AGED 57 YEARS, APPAPURAM VILLAGE OF MANDAVALI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. KATI SUDHARSAN RAO,, S/O SANJEEV RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, APPAPURAM VILLAGE OF MANDAVALI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. KATI SATISH KUMAR,, S/O SUDHARSAN RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, ADDRESS MARAKANDEYA NAGAR, ECIL, KAPARA, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. KATI KOTHURU KARTHIKA, W/O. VINOD KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, C/O. NALLAMELLI NAGESWARA RAO, H.NO.12-131, WARD NO.12, DENDULURU, DENDULURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DIST., 3. KATI SRESTA, , (MINOR REP BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN/ MOTHER) D/O KATI VINOD KUMAR, AGES 2 YEARS MOTHER PROTECTION, C/O. NALLAMELLI NAGESWARA RAO, H.NO.12- 131, WARD NO.12, DENDULURU, DENDULURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DIST. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 2 1. KARTHIKSIDDARTHA SALADI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court Made the Following Order: The instant petition under Section 528 of the BNSS has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in D.V.C.No.10 of 2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bhimadole, West Godavari District. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners and liberty may be given to raise such grounds before the trial Court. 3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners. However, the petitioners can raise such grounds before the trial Court and the learned trial Judge shall take appropriate decision over the matter in accordance with law. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date : 18.11.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.11910 of 2025 Dt.18.11.2025 ASR