Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41108 (PNJ)

GURTEJ SINGH ALIAS TEJI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

CRM-M/17940/2025 · 2025-04-02

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17940-2025 DECIDED ON: 02.04.2025 GURTEJ SINGH ALIAS TEJI .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Baljinder Singh Virk, Sr. DAG Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This is a Petition under section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 (Earlier under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973) praying for quashing of case in FIR No.0482 Dated 29.10.2024 U/s 25(1-B)(a), 29(B) of Arms Act 1959 and 506IPC registered at Police Station Pinjore District Panchkula and all subsequent proceedings arising out the above said FIR qua the petitioner as another accused in the FIR namely Gurdarshan Singh already expired before the registration of the present FIR, in the interest of justice, equity and fair play. Learned State counsel on instructions from Inspector Rupesh Chaudhary informs the Court that a cancellation report has been prepared and the same will be presented to the Competent Authority within next two weeks. MEENU 2025.04.04 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-17940-2025 -2- Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court again, if the above-said statement is found to be incorrect. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 02.04.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MEENU 2025.04.04 11:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document