1 2025:CGHC:44822 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6991 of 2025 1 - Naeemuddin S/o Sirajuddin, Aged About 46 Years R/o Near Seth Tularam School, Gada Chowk, Supela, Police Station Supela, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Supela, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Tapan Kumar Chandra, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Vivek Sharma Addl. AG & Ms. Mukta Tripathi, PL SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 03.09.2025 1. This is the third bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.77/2023 registered at Police Station- Supela, Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G) for the offence under Sections 307 & 34 of the IPC. PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2025.09.03 15:24:30 +0530 2 2. The first bail application of the applicant was dismissed on merits vide order dated 06.07.2023 passed in MCRC No.3146/2023. The second bail application of the applicant was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 11.08.2025 passed in MCRC No.6341/2025. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that initially the applicant was enlarged on interim bail vide order dated 04.05.2023 passed in MCRC No.3146/2023 and the said MCRC was dismissed on merits on 06.07.2023. He fairly submits that thereafter, the applicant did not surrender and was arrested on 03.06.2025. He would further submit that the present applicant has not participated in the cross-examination of material witnesses and neither this fact has been brought to the notice of the concerned trial Court by the counsel, who appeared for the other co- accused. At this juncture, he seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this application with liberty to repeat the prayer after cross-examination of the material witnesses. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 5. The prayer is allowed. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the applicant. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Priyanka