Megha 902& 905_wp_2590 &wp_18530_24.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2590 OF 2016 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15131 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2590 OF 2016 Rieter India Employees’ Union ...Petitioner V/s. Rieter India Private Limited and Anr. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.18530 OF 2024 Rieter India Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner V/s. Kisan Tatyaba Mahangare and Ors. ...Respondents ______________ Mr. Abhishek Kulkarni with Mr. Sagar Wakale for the Petitioner in WP/2590/2016. Mr. Kiran S. Bapat, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav S. Gawande for Respondent in WP/2590/2016 and Petitioner in WP/18530/2024. ______________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Dated: 4 April 2025. P.C.: 1) The learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the parties have amicably resolved the disputes Page No. 1 of 2 4 April 2025 MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB Digitally signed by MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB Date: 2025.04.05 11:40:51 +0530 Megha 902& 905_wp_2590 &wp_18530_24.docx amongst them. Consent Terms are tendered, which are signed by the office bearers of the Union as well as by the authorised representative of the employer and by their respective advocates. The Consent terms are also signed by 18 individual members, at whose instance the complaint was filed. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The cheques towards the amounts agreed to be paid under the Consent Terms are handed over to the concerned employees. 2) Both the Petitions are disposed of in view of the Consent Terms. 3) Interim Application stands disposed of. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 4 April 2025