Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41100 (KAR)

M/S MYRADA v. THE REGIONAL PF COMMISSIONER-II EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION

WP/23774/2022 · 2025-09-02

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34517 WP No. 23774 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 23774 OF 2022 (L-PF) BETWEEN: M/S. MYRADA, NO.2, SERVICE ROAD, DOMLUR LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 071. REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION) …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRASHANTH B.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE REGIONAL PF COMMISSIONER-II, EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, K.R.PURAM, NO.F-28, NSU BLOCK, ITI CAMPUS(BENGALURU PLANT), DOORAVANI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 016. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, VIJAYA BANK, (ERSTWHILE KNOWN AS BANK OF BARODA) DOMLUR BRANCH, BANGALORE - 560 071. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NANDITHA D.HALDIPUR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI K.N.MAHABALESHWAR RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF ATTACHMENT DATED 26.10.2022 BEARING NO.RO/KRP/COMPL/DIV6/35939/2022- 23/3491 VIDE ANNEXURE-D PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY. Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34517 WP No. 23774 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondents are present. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has filed a memo seeking disposal of this matter on the ground that the petitioner has already preferred an appeal challenging the very same impugned order passed under Section 7A before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT). In view of the vacancy of the Court, the petitioner has preferred the present petition. 3. It is submitted by a memo that the tribunal is now functioning. Under the circumstances, the appeal could be agitated by the petitioner before the tribunal. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that after filing the present writ petition, he was beneficiary of an interim order passed by this Court on 30.11.2022, whereby this Court stayed the impugned order subject to deposit of 25% of the demand made by the notice dated 26.10.2022 and accordingly, he has - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34517 WP No. 23774 of 2022 deposited the said amount before the Authority, which is not in dispute. 5. However, in view of the resumption of duties and the tribunal functioning, it would serve no purpose for this Court to proceed in this matter, as the petitioner can agitate all his grievances, so also the contentions and grounds urged herein before the Tribunal. 6. The interim order so granted by this Court shall continue till the application for interim protection is considered by the tribunal in accordance with law. 7. The petitioner is at liberty to move necessary application before the tribunal for seeking relief whatsoever; the same shall be considered in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4