APHC010549432017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2592/2017 Between: 1. PADALA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, KRISHNA DT.,, S/O LATE SHIVA SHANKARA MUNI REDDY, OCC: PRAIVATE EMPLOYE, R/O D.NO.17-4-58/2-3, BAPPISTPALEM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATES OF TELANGANA AND A.P. 2. PADALA SATYA KUMARI, W/O RAMA KRISHNA REDDY, R/O D.NO.4-10, ARAVALLI VILLAGE, ATTILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 03-08-2017 in Criminal Revision Petition No. 68/2016 passed by the IV Additional District and Session Judge's Court, Tanuku, West Godavari District and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2017 (CRLRCMP 4245 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 03-08-2017 in Criminal Revision Petition No. 68/2016 on the file of the IV Additional District and Session Judge's Court, Tanuku, West Godavari District and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M K TIRUPAMA DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. T V JAGGI REDDY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.2592 of 2017 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 03.08.2017 passed in Crl.R.P.No.68 of 2016 on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tanuku. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according the instructions received, the matter is compromised between the parties and requests permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision Case. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Considering the submission made, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 03.11.2025 M K K