Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:KER:28016 W.P.(C). No.8759 of 2022 : 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 8759 OF 2022 PETITIONERS: 1 M.A.SHEMEER, AGED 45 YEARS S/O. ABOOBAKKER, CHAIRMAN, REPRESENTING PERUMBAVOOR GENERAL MARKETING FEDERATION (P) LTD., PATHIPALAM, VENGOLA, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 556. 2 P.K. SAIDU MUHAMMED, AGED 60 YEARS S/O. KUNJU MYTHEEN, MANAGING DIRECTOR, PERUMBAVOOR GENERAL MARKETING FEDERATION (P) LTD., PATHIPALAM, VENGOLA, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 556.
BY ADV S.MURALI RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM . 2 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, (CIRCLE INSPECTOR), PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2025:KER:28016 W.P.(C). No.8759 of 2022 : 2 : 4 V.A. MAHINSHA, AGED 42 YEARS S/O. ALIYAR, VELLAPILLY HOUSE, RAYONPURAM P.O., KANJIRAKKAD, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT . 5 RIJAL M.S., S/O. LATE SULAIMAN, MUNDAKKAL HOUSE, VENGOLA VILLAGE ALAPARA P.O., KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 556. 6 B KAMAL, AGED 55 YEARS S/O. BAVA KHAN, MALETH HOUSE, KADATHARA, ALAPARA P.O., PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 556. 7 MAHIL KAMAL, AGED 28 YEARS S/O. B. KAMAL, MALETH HOUSE, KADATHARA, ALAPARA P.O., PERUMBAVOOR , ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 683 556.
BY ADVS.
P.THOMAS GEEVERGHESE TONY THOMAS (INCHIPARAMBIL) E.S.FIROS AMRUTHA K.P.
OTHER PRESENT:
GP- NIMA JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:28016 W.P.(C). No.8759 of 2022 : 3 :
VIJU ABRAHAM, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.8759 of 2022 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2025 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they are not pressing the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM
JUDGE sm/