IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 297 OF 2025 Appeal filed under section 115 of CPC., aggrieved by the return order dated 12-12-2024 passed in un-numbered E.A No.- 2024 (C.F.R No.8219/2024) in E.P No.62 of 2022 in O.S No.40 of 2020 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle. Between: 1. Bapanapalle Dada Vali, S/o Mastan Sab, aged about 47 years, R/o D.No.5-79, Marrimanu Street, Kurabalakota (V & M), Annamayya District. 2. Lepakshi Reddi Sab, S/o Rasul Sab, aged about 41 yrs, Dudekulapalli H/o Tsandravaripalle, Kalikiri Mandal, Annamayya District. Rep by it's GPA Holder 1st Petitioner B.Dada Vali. ...Petitioners/Claim Petitioners AND 1. Marupuri Ramakrishna, S/o Late Rammurthy Naidu, aged about 52 years. Business, R/o D.No.l4-573-C, Burma Street, Madanapalle Town, Annamayya District. 2. Mallidi Vinod Kumar, S/o Prabhakar Naidu, aged about 46 years. Business, R/o D.No.l4-573-C, Burma Street, Madanapalle Town, Annamayya District. 3. Vakkalagadda Bhaskar Reddy, S/o Pedda Reddappa, aged about 43 years. Employee, 4. Pothuri Shobha, W/o Venkateswara Rao, aged about 42 yrs. House Wife, (Respondents Nos 3 and 4 are residing at D.N0.3-145-9-6-2-4-A- 2, Prashanth Nagar, Madanapalle Town, Annamayya district. 5. Pagadala Venkatamma, W/o Late Kommu Venkata Ramana, aged about 62 years. Housewife, R/o D.No.56-3, GollapalleMitta, CTM Post and Village, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District. 6. Gundluri Yelamma, W/o Late Lakshmanna, aged about 42 years. Housewife, R/o Kondakindapalle, Matlivaripalle Village, Kurabalakota Mandal, Annamayya Dist. 7. Manchala Arunamma, W/o M.Chandra, aged about 37 years. Housewife, R/o Harijanawada, Burakayalakota post and Village, Mulakalacheruvu Mandal, Annamayya District. ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.62 of 2022 in O.S.No.40 of 2020 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle pending disposal of the main C.R.P. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri N. A. Ramachandra Murthy Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the following: APHC010027272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 297/2025 Between: Bapanapalle Dada Vali and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Marupuri Ramakrishna and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): ...RESPONDENT(S) 1. 2 HBKM.J C.R.P.No.297 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This revision is filed against the docket order passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Madanapalle, in an un-numbered 2. E.A.No. of 2024 (C.F.R.No.8219/2024) in E.P.No.62 of 2022 in O.S.No.40 of 2020, dated 12.12.2024. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the claim petitioners and the respondents/decree holders and the respondents/judgment debtors are trying to execute the decree against the interests of the petitioners/claim petitioners herein. As it is a collusive decree according to the petitioners, when the petitioners filed the above said claim petition before the Court below, the same was returned on 26.11.2024 and it presented on 29.11.2024, complying with the said objections. However, the office of the Court below again returned it on 12.12.2024. Hence, this Revision. was re in view of the above said facts and circumstances, as it is the duty of the office of the Court below to raise valid objections at the time of scrutiny of the application filed by the petitioners, the above said objections appear to have been noticed by the Registry, for which only once on the above said date of 29.11.2024, the petitioners re-presented. But, when it was returned for the 2'"'^ time 4. 3 HBKM.J C.R.P.No.297of2025 the same was not complied with by way of re-presentation of the above said claim petition. The petitioners shall comply with the objections, if any, over the claim petition in accordance with law by following the due procedure and if so warranted they can also seek for placing the un-numbered claim petition before the presiding Judge of the Court below for hearing on the objections and compliance thereof and appropriate orders can be passed by the Court below on merits in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. It is always open for the petitioners to work out their remedies under law. Return the original documents filed in this CRP under a proper acknowledgment by substituting with the Xerox copies. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There 5. shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, ^ (Senior Division); Madanapalle, Chittoor 2. The Section Officer, E.R. Section, High Court of A.P. 3. One CC to Sri N. A. Ramachandra Murthy, Advocate fOPUCl 4. Three CD Copies SAM Cnr HIGH COURT SAM DATED:07/02/2025 ORDER CRP.No.297 of 2025 f 21 FEB 2025 $ Current Section ^It^PgSPATCV*^-^ DISPOSING OF THIS CRP