- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38430-DB COMAP No. 138 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 138 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MS. ANJALI SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, D/O RETD. MAJ. GEN. V K SHRIVASTAVA, RESIDING AT B-111, CLASSIC ROYAL GARDEN, HENNUR MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 043. … APPELLANT (BY MR. ASHWIN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI MURALI A, ADVOCATE) AND: MRS. SHWETA SHYAM JARTARGHAR, W/O MR. ARPAN SAMUEL RAMTEK, R/A: 2365, SOBHA INDRAPRASTHA, TOWER -II, GOPALAPURA, RAJAJINAGAR, NEAR MINERVA MILLS COMPOUND, BANGALORE - 560 094. ALSO AT FLAT NO. 2121, SOBHA FOREST EDGE, 100 FT. VAJRAHALI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 062. … RESPONDENT (BY SMT. KAVERI THIMMAIAH, ADVOCATE A/W MR. GAGAN GANAPATHY, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38430-DB COMAP No. 138 of 2025 THIS COMAP/COMMERCIAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1A) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT READ WITH SECTION 37(1) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.12.2024 PASSED BY THE LXXXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (COMMERCIAL COURT) BENGALURU (CCH-87) IN COM.AP 80/2024 DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED BY THE APPELLANT UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE A OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. During the course of the proceedings conducted on 18.09.2025, it was submitted on behalf of the respondent that the respondent would accept the payment of `45,00,000/- in full and final settlement of all the claims and her rights of the partnership firm in the name of 'M/s. Calico Tribe Clothing LLP'. The parties had sought time to file memo of settlement. 2. The parties have since filed the joint memo setting out the terms, joint memo is taken on record. They are bound by the said terms. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38430-DB COMAP No. 138 of 2025 3. Both the parties are present in Court and it is stated on their behalf that they would abide by the terms of the settlement as per the joint memo. 4. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the joint memo filed by the parties. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16