Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040001022024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Petn./10/2024 Bani Mangam and Anr D/o Palang Mangam, R/o Bameng Village, Seppa, East Kameng District, AP 2: Mepung Riang Age: Occupation : D/o Taku Riang resident of Longriang Village Bameng Circle East Kameng District A VERSUS The State of AP and 2 Ors represented by the PP of AP 2:Meya Diging Age: 0 Occupation : D/o Tasang Diging resident of Chayang Tajo Village East Kameng District AP 3:Neelam Aning Age: 0 Occupation : D/o Shri Neelam Pope Resident of Ganga Village PO Itanaga Advocate for the Petitioner : L John, Leevina J.,Asha Likha Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Taying Nega,Tem Pahi,L Kagung,T Dignium,Taba Topu
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 04.09.2025
None appears for the petitioners, on call. However, Mr. Token Ete, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, is present on behalf of the respondent State of Arunachal Pradesh.
The record reveals that on earlier occasions also, the learned counsel for the petitioners had remained absent.
On 02.07.2025, this Court directed the matter to be listed after the ensuing Summer Vacation on a date to be fixed by the Registry and made an observation to the effect that if the learned counsel for the petitioners does not appear on the next date; this Court may proceed to dismiss the petition for default.
From the above, it appears that the petitioners, herein, are no longer interested in pursuing this matter.
In view of non-representation of the petitioners on today too; the instant criminal petition stands dismissed for default and for non-prosecution.
Interim order passed by this Court, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant