Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41073 (RAJ)

MUNNA LAL S/O SHRI MEHAR CHAND SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMA/194/2025 · 2025-10-10

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41332] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Application No. 194/2025 Munna Lal S/o Shri Mehar Chand Saini, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Narnaul, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendragarh, Hariyana. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hukam Chand Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 10/10/2025 1. This 2nd S.B. criminal misc. application has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer that the Superintendent of Police Behror may be directed to monitor/supervise the investigation/ enquiry of the Criminal Complaint No.134/2014 and to ensure proper investigation of the aforesaid complaint. 2. It is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that with the similar prayer, earlier S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1898/2019 was filed by the petitioner in which certain directions have been issued and the criminal misc. petition was allowed vide order dated 02.08.2019. Thereafter, the petitioner moved S.B. Criminal Misc. Application No.393/2022, which was also disposed of by this Court vide order dated 01.12.2023. 3. Now, the second criminal misc. application has been moved for seeking further directions to the similar effect. It is clear that the instant application filed by the petitioner is in the [2025:RJ-JP:41332] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-194/2025] nature of recalling or modifying the earlier directions given by this Court and to seek directions in furtherance. 4. It is settled proposition of law that in criminal jurisprudence, after deciding the matter finally, the scope of recalling is extremely limited. Hence, this Court does not find it fit to interfere in the instant criminal misc. application and the same is, hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedies otherwise available to him in law. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /16