DR DINESH KUMAR SHARMA S/O CHIRANJI LAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1079/2025 · 2025-01-29
Inderjeet Singh, Pramil Kumar Mathur
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4107 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4107 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4048-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1079/2025 Dr Dinesh Kumar Sharma S/o Chiranji Lal Sharma, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Chuli Gate, Middle School No. 2 Ke Pass, Ward No. 14, Gangapur, Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda (Ayush) Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiyachikitsa (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretriat, Jaipur.
3. Dy. Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiyachikitsa (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. Director Ayurveda, Directorate Of Ayurveda, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 29/01/2025
1. After the order was passed by this Court earlier on 20.09.2024 in another petition, new developments have been brought to the notice of this Court, one of them regarding dismissal of the Review Petition by the Hon’ble Supreme Court
[2025:RJ-JP:4048-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-1079/2025] filed in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma & Ors. on 15.10.2024, as stated at the bar by
learned counsel for the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed before this Court order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The State of Rajashtan & Ors. Vs. Pyare Lal Meena & Ors. (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10560/2024), wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has clarified that there is no stay on the judgment of the High Court and further that in the event the outstanding towards salary has not been paid, the same shall be cleared within a period of one week. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner has retired from service on 31.10.2023.
3. In view of the above developments, we need not keep this petition pending and same is also finally disposed of in terms of
order passed earlier by this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. And other connected matters (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13496/2021), decided on 13.07.2022. The petitioner will be entitled to the same relief as was granted in the aforesaid cases, meaning thereby, the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement as he has not completed 62 years of age with all consequential benefits including monetary benefits to continue in service up to the age of 62 years.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/49