Sri P. Ramanjineyulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/31936/2025 · 2025-11-17
D Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41059 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41059 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010615072025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31936/2025 Between:
1. SRI P. RAMANJINEYULU, , S/O LATE P. POTHANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 2. SMT. P. PARVATHI,, YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3. SMT. MANDALA JYOTHI,, W/O M VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4. SRI P. GIRISH, , S/O P. RAMANJAN R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 5. SRI SYED ASHFAQ HUSSAIN,, S/O SYED ABBAS HUSSAIN (LATE). AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PUTTAPARTHI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31936/2025 SRI P. RAMANJINEYULU, , S/O LATE P. POTHANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SMT. P. PARVATHI,, W/O P. RAMANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI SMT. MANDALA JYOTHI,, W/O M VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI SRI P. GIRISH, , S/O P. RAMANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. SRI SYED ASHFAQ HUSSAIN,, S/O SYED ABBAS HUSSAIN (LATE). AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND TE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PUTTAPARTHI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3208]
SRI P. RAMANJINEYULU, , S/O LATE P. POTHANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA W/O P. RAMANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI SMT. MANDALA JYOTHI,, W/O M VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI EYULU, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. SRI SYED ASHFAQ HUSSAIN,, S/O SYED ABBAS HUSSAIN (LATE).
AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, ...PETITIONER(S) TE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PUTTAPARTHI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB COLLECTOR AND SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PENUKONDA DIVISION ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. THE SUB REGISTER, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents more specifically, the 2nd and respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioners dated 14.10.2025, 05.11.2025, and 10.11.2025 for seeking deletion of Sy. Nos. 453-4 (Ac. 1.50), 453-1 (Ac. 2.45), and 451 (Ac. 2.26), situated at Penukonda Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District from the dispute register, is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 300-A of the Constitution of India. Consequently, direct the 2nd and 5th respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 14.10.2025, 05.11.2025, and 10.11.2025 to delete the Sy. Nos. 453-4 (Ac. 1.50), 453-1 (Ac. 2.45), and 451 (Ac. 2.26), situated at Penukonda Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District form the dispute register, and, pass such other and further orders as this Honble Court may deem fit, just, and proper in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 2nd & 5th respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners dated: 14.10.2025, 05.11.2025, and 10.11.2025 to delete the Sy. Nos. 453-4 (Ac. 1.50), 453-1 (Ac. 2.45), and 451 (Ac. 2.26), situated at Penukonda Village & Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District form the dispute register, and grant such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORDER:
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition after impleading the necessary party.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. No costs.
Consequently, the interlocutory applications, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 18.11.2025 KKV
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
259
WRIT PETITION NO: 31936/2025
18.11.2025 KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No.: W.P.No.31859 of 2025
PROCEEDING SHEET
SL. No. DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
01.
18.11.2025
DR, J
This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(vide separate order)
______ DR, J KKV