Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41057 (ALL)

ADITYA VIJAY SEHGAL @ NUTAN VIJAY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/11189/2025 · 2025-04-28

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:66296 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11189 of 2025 Petitioner :- Aditya Vijay Sehgal @ Nutan Vijay Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Chandragupta Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.P. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that his name has been wrongly recorded in the marks sheet-cum-certificate of Intermediate Examination-2018. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent- authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.3-Regional Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, U.P. Regional Office, Meerut within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Sattyarth Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad