Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41045 (AP)

ALLADA RAMAKRISHNA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/30973/2022 · 2025-12-22

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010504802022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. ALLADA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. GOPALARAO, MALE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 5 APARTMENTS, NALLAJERLA, VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. ALLADA JAYARAM, W/O. RAMAKRISHANA, FEMALE, ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 5 APARTMENTS, NALLAJERLA, VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ A DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL PANCHAYATRAJ OFFICER, AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE NALLAJERLA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS EXETUIVE AUTHORITY CUM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 30973/2022 ALLADA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. GOPALARAO, MALE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 5-65, VIGNAN BHAVAN APARTMENTS, NALLAJERLA, VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ALLADA JAYARAM, W/O. RAMAKRISHANA, FEMALE, ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 5-651 VIGNAN BHAVAN APARTMENTS, NALLAJERLA, VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ A DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. THE DIVISIONAL PANCHAYATRAJ OFFICER, AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. THE NALLAJERLA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS EXETUIVE AUTHORITY CUM-PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, NALLAJERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ALLADA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. GOPALARAO, MALE, HINDU, AGED 65, VIGNAN BHAVAN APARTMENTS, NALLAJERLA, VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST ALLADA JAYARAM, W/O. RAMAKRISHANA, FEMALE, HINDU, AGED 651 VIGNAN BHAVAN APARTMENTS, NALLAJERLA, VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST THE DIVISIONAL PANCHAYATRAJ OFFICER, AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. THE NALLAJERLA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS EXETUIVE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, NALLAJERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. VALLURI DHANA LAKSHMI NARAYANA, W/O. SATYANARAYANA, SATTIPANDU, FEMALE, AGE NOT KNOWN, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. NALLAJERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. TATINA GOVINDARAJU, S/O SURYA CHANDRARAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. PRAKASARAOPALEM VILLAGE, NALLAJERLA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISRICT. 7. MULLAPUDI SRINIVASARAO, S/O. LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED NOT KNOW, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. AKSHAYA APARTMENTS, NALLAJERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. TIRUMALA SURIBABU, S/O. KOTESWARARAO AGED ABOUT NOT KNOW, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. NEAR SANTHOSH NAGAR GAS AGECY, TADEAPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. KALAGARA SRI LAKSHMI, W/O. RAMAKRISHNA, AGED NOT KNOW, OCC. PRINCIPAL OF ELITE SCHOOL R/O. DOBHACHARLA VILLAGE, NALLJERLA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 10. MADDIPATI KUTUMBARAO, S/O. RAMARAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. NALLAJERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the official respondents in not initiating any action against the illegal constructions made within the limits of 4th respondent gram panchayat, including the constructions under taken by respondents No.5 to 10 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory and unconstitutional but also violative of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, and offends Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to take action on respondents No.5 to 10 from making said illegal construction and remove already constructed portion thereof and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 consider our representation dated 01.09.2022, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant leave to file counter in WP.No. 30973 of 2022 to pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant leave to file counter in WP No. 30973 of 2022 to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GHANTA SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. B CHANDRA SHEKHAR 3. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for MPP ZPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) 4. T V JAGGI REDDY ORDER Ms. Karishma, learned counsel, representing Sri Ghanta Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permitted accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATED 23RD day of December, 2025. RR