Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41044 (RAJ)

BHASKAR SANGAT S/O CHOTU LAL SANGAT v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH SECRETARY

CW/20546/2018 · 2025-08-28

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34524] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20546/2018 1. Bhaskar Sangat S/o Chotu Lal Sangat, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Behind Of Degree College Kumhar Mohalla, Jhalawar District Jhalawar (Raj.) 2. Chandan Sangat S/o Chotu Lal Sangat, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Behind Of Degree College Kumhar Mohalla, Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, Local Self, Department Of Local Self, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Deputy Director (Regional), Local Self, Department Of Local Self, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The District Collector, District Kota Rajasthan. 5. The Executive Officer, Nagar Palika, Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar Rajasthan. 6. The Executive Officer Nagar Palika, Jhalawar District Jhalawar Rajasthan. 7. The Commissioner Municipal Board Jhalawar, District Jhalawar Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 28/08/2025 1. Both the learned counsel appearing for parties are in complete agreement, that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated [2025:RJ-JP:34524] (2 of 2) [CW-20546/2018] 30.08.2018 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10496/2018 (Ravi Jajot & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.). 2. In view of above, consensus took place between the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the light of aforesaid judgment of Ravi Jajot (supra) and the benefits granted in the aforesaid case shall also be admissible to the petitioner. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/52