Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41044 (AP)

Smt S. Bhavani, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/9654/2022 · 2025-10-30

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010151782022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9654/2022 Between: SMT S. BHAVANI, W/O. RY. RAGHUACHARI, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, YALAKALLU VILLAGE, V-KOTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT. VELAGAPUDI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, V-KOTA PS, V-KOTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, V-KOTA PS, V-KOTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. THE HEAD CONSTABLE, V-KOTA PS, V-KOTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BASHA SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the Respondents no.5 to 7 misusing their powers by removing entire serious allegations in my complaint dated 15.02.2022 and threatened me and abused me with filthy language for new complaint dated 22.02.2022 by 7th Respondent with drunken status with malafide intention as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents no 1 to 4 to conduct enquiry in this matter and take necessary action against the Respondent no 5 to 7 on my report dated 07.03.2022, and 18.02.2022.” 2. Heard Basha Shaik, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that let there by a direction to complete the investigation in Crime No.26 of 2022 on the file of V.Kota Urban Police Station, Chittoor District and file a report as expeditiously as possible. 4. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Respondents - Police to conclude the investigation in Crime No.26 of 2022 on the file of V.Kota Urban Police Station, Chittoor District, if not concluded, and file a report in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:31.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.9654 of 2022 Dt.31.10.2025 Dinesh