Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:4187 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1 No.474 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Avidit Noliyal, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA along with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Present applicant–Praveen Vishwas S/o Shri Nirapad Vishwas is in judicial custody since 07.01.2025 and seeking bail in relation to FIR/Case Crime No.10 of 2025, registered on the basis of FIR dated 05.01.2025 at Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein the present applicant along with one person, namely, Pralad Vaid has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 109 of the B.N.S, 2023.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. Apart from this, he submits that the present applicant has no previous criminal history and now in this case, the charge- sheet has already been filed, therefore there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant. Apart from this, he submits that the main dispute relates to filling of water from a tap and otherwise there is no any intention on the part of the present applicant.
5. On the other side, learned State counsel submits that the injury has been caused by sharp edged weapon and danger to the life, however, he has not disputed this fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present
2025:UHC:4187 applicant. He has also not disputed this fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history.
6. After hearing the
arguments as advanced by learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the charge-sheet has already been filed and there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant and the applicant has no previous criminal history, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the present bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant, namely, Praveen Vishwas, be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 20.05.2025 R.Bisht
2025:UHC:4187