Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41035 (KAR)

MR.CHANNAPPA v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/19383/2025 · 2025-08-21

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32658 WP No. 19383 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19383 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR.CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, S/O LATE CHANNEGOWDA, NO.707, VIJAYA MANSION APARTMENT, CLUB ROAD, 1ST MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-040 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GANAPATI JAYADEVA HEGDE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571401. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MANDYA SUB-DIVISION, MANDYA-571401. 3. THASILDAR, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA-571401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MOHAMMED JAFFER SHAH, AGA) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32658 WP No. 19383 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER AND DECIDE UPON THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION/NOTICE DATED 04/10/2024 AT ANNEXURE-A IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND WITHIN A TIME-FRAME DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THIS HONBLE COURT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned AGA takes notice for all the respondents. 2. Learned AGA raises a preliminary objection that the petitioner is seeking to espouse a public cause. The petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to take corrective steps and set at naught the illegality said to have been perpetuated at the hands of Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprises Limited. 3. It is pointed out that the said Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprises Limited is also not made as a party/respondent to the proceedings. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32658 WP No. 19383 of 2025 4. Upholding the submissions made by the learned AGA, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a public interest litigation, if so advised. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25