/’ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER ; TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO lA No. 1 OF 2025 IN CRLP NO: 11330 OF 2025 Between: 1. R. Santho Sivam, S/o Raghupathi, Aged 23 years, R/o Aarni Village, Gummadipoondi Taluka, Thiruyallur District, State of Tamil Nadu. 2. J. Karthik, S/o Jaganhadhan, Aged 22 years, R/o Aarni Village, Gummadipoondi Taluka, Thifuvallur District, State of Tamil Nadu. Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure code/ Section 528 of BNSS is filed praying that in the “circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to modify the order dt. 18.11.2025 passed by this Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in CRLP.No. 11330 of 2025 in Cr.No. 117 of 2025 on the file of the Yeiamanchiii Rural Police Station, Anakapaili by considering the situation of the” Petitioners/Accused No. 1 & 2 as "The Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall be enlarged on bail subject to" they executing bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/-’ (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with one surety for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate,' Yeiamanchiii. Instead of the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1. enlarged on bail subject td lbby executing bond for (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) Bach with two sureties for the like and 2 shall be' a sum of Rs.20,000/-' sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate Yelamanchiii. The petition coming oh for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the dated affidavit filed in support' thereof and the order of the High Court 18.11.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. DASARI RAMAKOTESWAR RAO, Advocate for the Petitioners and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent, the court made the following ORDER “Heard the learned coiihsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed i support of the petition, the imposed in on the petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 and 2 in CrI.P|No.11330 of 2025 dated 18.11.2025 that they Shalt execute a personal bond for Rs.20,000/- each with two sureties tor a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Yel^imnchili, is hereby modified as follows: The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 herein shall be released on their executing a personal bond for Rs.20,000/- each with one surety each for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional' Judicial First Class Magistrate, Yelamanchiii. Accordingly, the I.A.NOif of 2025 is allowed. /- r SD/- K.SRlNiVASA RAJU ASSSSTAMT REGISTRAR SECTlON OFFICER ^//TRilE COPY// For, to. 1. The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Yelamanchiii. 2. The Superintendent, Vizag Central Prison, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Station House Officer, Yelamanchili Rural Police Station Anakapalli District. 4. One CC to Sri. DASARl RAMAKOTESWAR RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCS to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati. [OUT] 6. One spare copy j j t f ■/ 5 4 ■ HIGH COURT DR.YLR,J DATED:24/12/2025 ORDER lA No. 1 OF 2025 IN CRLP NO: 11330 OF 2025 THE I.A.N0.1 OF 2025 IS ALLOWED