Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010498412018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1750 OF 2018 Between:
1. ALLURI MADHAVA RAO, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O. DOOR NO. 26-14- 11, ACHARYA RANGA STREET, TANUKU, TANUKU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD. 2. VEMIREDDY CHENCHU RAMI REDDY, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O. BESTAWARIPETA, BESTAWARIPETA MANDAL,
PRAKASAM DISTRICT. A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Order dated 09.05.2018 in Crl M.P No 2904 of 2018 of in CC No.95/2013 on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judges Court Giddallur, Prakasam District and to stay of all further proceedings in the above CC No.95/2013 and allow the Crl.R.C. and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings in CC No. 95/2013 on the file of the Additional
2
Junior Civil Judges Court Giddallur, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the Crl. R.C. and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SRI K. SANDEEP, ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
O R D E R
1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioner/accused under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the Order dated 09.05.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2904 of 2018 in C.C.No.95 of 2013 on the file of learned Additional Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Giddaluru (for short, ‘the trial Court’). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, the Crl.M.P.No.2904 of 2018 has been filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 243 of Cr.P.C. seeking to send the cheque with admitted signatures of the petitioner/accused to the Hand Writing Expert. By impugned order dated 09.05.2018, the learned trial Court dismissed the petition by recording certain reasons. Against the said order, the petitioner/accused preferred the present revision. 4.
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the main C.C.No.95 of 2013 was disposed on 17.02.2023. In support of this, a copy from the e-Courts website has been filed, which reflects that the said C.C.No.95 of 2013 was disposed on 17.02.2023 and it was dismissed on uncontest. 5. Recording the said submission of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and in view of the disposal of the C.C.No.95 of 2013 on 17.02.2023, this Court finds the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 3
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date: 23.12.2025 MS
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1750 of 2018 Date: 23.12.2025
MS