Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35490-DB CCC No. 999 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 999 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
S. NAGARAJA RAO AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS S/O LATE NAGAPPA R/O HULIMANGALA VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU
…COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. KARTHIK S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING, 6TH FLOOR BENGALURU-560 001
2.
SRI. K.A. DAYANAND THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT K G ROAD BENGALURU-560 009
Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35490-DB CCC No. 999 of 2024
3.
SRI. RAJANIKANTH THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SUB DIVISION K G ROAD BENGALURU-560 009
4.
SRI. B. VENKATESH THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL-560 105
…ACCUSED
(BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, AGA)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO (a) INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED Nos.2 TO 4 HEREIN FOR THEIR WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 31.05.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP No.12192/2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED Nos.2 TO 4 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35490-DB CCC No. 999 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
It is submitted by the learned Additional Government Advocate that a compliance affidavit has been filed on 29.10.2024 on behalf of accused No.2 and that the directions contained in the order passed by the learned Single Judge have been complied with and an endorsement is issued to the petitioner by the District Administration dated 13.09.2024.
2. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court case is dropped reserving liberty to the complainant to challenge the endorsement if aggrieved.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
RAK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 4