APHC010174302022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10865/2022 Between: 1. G. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA, W/O G DAMODAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O JANUMPALLI VILLAGE, PEBBAIR MANDAL, GADWAL DISTRICT OF OLD MAHABUBNAGAR DISTRICT STATE OF TELANGANA ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT A.P SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DIST., ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS AND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT D NO 24-28/1-8A DURGAPURAM, GULABITHOTA, VIJAYAWADA- 520003,ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, DONTHALI,NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to pass a writ, order or direction more particularly in the name of writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of Constitution of India, declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the Petitioners son a life convict on Parole/Furlough by rejecting all his repeated Applications and not considering even for once despite of the fact that he completed more than 18 years of actual imprisonment and 20 years including all remissions is illegal and unlawful, moreover unconstitutional violating Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and against the Andhra Pradesh Prison Rules 2 and the very concept of Respondent Prisons and Correctional Services Consequently direct the Respondents to take immediate steps to release my Son Gundla Vishnuvardhan Reddy Sio Damodar Reddy (CT No 6724 ) Aged 34 years from Respondent No 3 Central Prison, Nellore by granting Parole or Furlough under the Rules of Andhra Pradesh Prison Manual and pass.” 2. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last occasion i.e. on 10.10.2022. 3. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:30.10.2025 rsd 3 97 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.10865 of 2022 Dt.30.10.2025 rsd