APHC010241702021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.13911 of 2021 Between: 1. P. VENKATA MUNNI REDDY, S/ O, P. MUNI REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H. NO. 4-26/1, PMR NAGAR, MR PALLI, TIRUPATHI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, EXCISE COMPLEX, SAI VIHAR APARTMENTS, PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate order or orders particularly under Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondents for not processing the Bar policy for the period of 2020-2021(from 01.01.2020 to 31.12.2021) as perG.O.MS. No.473 dated 22.11.2019, is illegal, 2 arbitrary, unjust, violation natural justice, violation of Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 and violation of rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No. 2 to 5 to refund the petitioner deposited amount of Rs.10,00,000/- ( Ten Lakhs Only) for establishment of Bar licenses vide Challan No.31252193072019 dated 05.12.2019 with interest. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri T.Harsha Sai Pavan, learned counsel represented on behalf of Sri Ch.Venkat Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner on record and stated that the present Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the above representation made on behalf of the writ petitioner, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.11.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.13911 of 2021 Date: 18.11.2025 siva