Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41011 (CHH)

VIJAY DEWANGAN v. SMT. SANGITA DEWANGAN

CRR/1273/2018 · 2025-06-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:27758 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1273 of 2018 Vijay Dewangan S/o Late Shri Jagmohan Dewangan Aged About 31 Years R/o- Village- Saragaon, P.S.- Kharora, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Sangita Dewangan W/o Vijay Dewangan Aged About 30 Years R/o- Sangita Beauty Parlor, Ambedkar Chowk, Gudhiyari, P.S.- Gudhiyari, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Jai Dewangan S/o Vijay Dewangan Aged About 7 Years Respondent No. 2 Through There Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Sangita Dewangan, Aged About 30 Years, W/o- Vijay Dewangan, R/o- Sangita Beauty Parlor, Ambedkar Chowk, Gudhiyari, P.S.- Gudhiyari, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ku. Ghanishtha Dewangan S/o Vijay Dewangan Aged About 4 Years Respondent No. 3 Through There Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Sangita Dewangan, Aged About 30 Years, W/o- Vijay Dewangan, R/o- Sangita Beauty Parlor, Ambedkar Chowk, Gudhiyari, P.S.- Gudhiyari, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : None. For Non-applicants : None. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 25.06 .2025 . 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicant as well as non-applicant to press this revision on repeated calls. 2. By way of this revision, the applicant has prayed for following relief:- “It is therefore prayed that the revision may kindly allowed and the impugned order dated 06.10.2018 may kindly be set aside in the interest of justice.” 3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. 5. Let a copy of this order and the original records be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal