CRM-M-71097- IN THE H (125) MUNIR SINGH STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. N MANISHA BATR 1. The 483 of Bharatiya N of regular bail in under Sections 11 Sanhita at Police S 2. The statement got reco evening of 26.09.2 Harsh and Manish an unlawful assem -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH NGH Versus
HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Arvinder Arora, Advocate for the Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed atiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in case arising out of FIR No.30 ons 110, 115, 118(2), 190, 191(3) an olice Station Naraingarh, District Amb The aforementioned FIR was reg recorded by the complainant Visha 26.09.2025, he was present at Krishna anish, when the petitioner accompan assembly and opened an assault upo JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-71097-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.02.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA
for the petitioner by the petitioner under Section , 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for grant 309 dated 27.09.2025 registered (3) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya t Ambala. s registered on the basis of the t Vishal alleging therein that on the rishna Market alongwith his friends ompanied by the co-accused formed ult upon him. The petitioner struck M) 2026 oner
dent
ction grant tered yaya the n the iends rmed truck AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.27 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-71097- blow with the ge caused injuries on rushed for his res and then they fled 3. After The petitioner was recovered at his in stands completed 4. It is a falsely implicated is in custody sin conclude. His fur therefore, argued t 5. Per c report, has argued He alongwith the injuries on the per witnesses are yet t those witnesses, therefore, argued t -2025 (O&M) 2 the gear-welded rod on his head, wh ries on his person with their respectiv rescue, they too sustained injuries y fled away. After registration of FIR, investigatio er was arrested on 27.09.2025. The t his instance. The co-accused were al leted. It is argued by learned counsel for icated in this case. A false recovery h dy since 27.09.2025. The trial wi is further incarceration would not se gued that the petition deserves to be al Per contra, learned state counsel w rgued that the allegations against the p th the coaccused had voluntary cause the person of the complainant and one e yet to be examined. There are chanc if extended benefit of bail. His a gued that the petition does not deserve whereas the other accused also pective weapons. When his friends juries at the hands of the assailants tion proceedings were initiated. The weapon used in the crime was ere also arrested. Investigation now r the petitioner that he has been very has been planted upon him. He ial will take considerable time to not serve any useful purpose. It is, o be allowed. nsel while relying upon the status st the petitioner are serious in nature. caused simple as well as grievous nd one of his friends. The material e chances of petitioner’s intimidating His antecedents are not clean. It is, eserve to be allowed. also iends lants . was now been . He e to It is, tatus ture. vous terial ating It is, AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.27 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-71097- 6. This C for both the parties 7. The p with the co-accuse of the complainant petitioner has been make out a case fo However, he is in investigation. T considerable time continued detentio bail is the rule an replica of post- appearance of the In view of the disc is made out for g petition is allowed his furnishing pers trial Court/Chief J 8. In the petitioner, it shall application seekin -2025 (O&M) 3 This Court has heard the rival submis parties at considerable length. The petitioner by forming members accused is alleged to have voluntarily lainant and his two friends. The injury as been opined to be grievous in natur case for commission of the subject off e is in custody since 27.09.2025. H . The trial is yet to commence e time to conclude. As such no fruitfu etention of the petitioner. The well se ule and jail is an exception. Pre-tria -conviction sentencing. The ob of the accused during trial, and it can he discussion as made above, this Cou t for grant of bail to the petitioner a owed and the petitioner is ordered to g personal as well as surety bonds to hief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistr In the event of there being any FIR t shall be open to the respondent-State seeking cancellation of bail. ubmissions made by learned counsel mbership of an unlawful assembly ntarily caused injuries on the person injury that has been attributed to the nature. The allegations prima facie ct offences as against the petitioner. . He is not required for further mence and obviously it will take fruitful purpose would be served by ell settled proposition of law is that trial incarceration should not be he object of the jail is to secure it cannot be preventive or punitive. is Court is of the opinion that a case oner at this stage. Accordingly, the ered to be released on bail subject to nds to the satisfaction of the learned agistrate concerned. IR/complaint lodged against the State to seek redressal by filing an unsel mbly rson o the cie . rther take d by that ot be cure itive. case , the ct to rned t the g an AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.27 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-71097- 9. It is m the purpose of dec on the merits of th 10. Since any, is rendered in 27.02.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 (O&M) 4 It is made clear that any observation of deciding the present petition and t s of the case. Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes
  
vation made herein above is only for and the same shall have no bearing een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
Yes/No
for aring n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.27 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.