MANOHAR LAL MEENA S/O SHRI ROHITASH MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5261/2025 · 2025-08-29
Sudesh Bansal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41004 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41004 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5261/2025 Manohar Lal Meena S/o Shri Rohitash Meena, resident of Village Shuklawas, Nareheda Kotputali District Jaipur 303105 ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 29/08/2025
1. Petitioner is an accused for charges under Sections 279/337 IPC in FIR No. 86/2011 registered at Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur City (South), against whom charge-sheet has been filed and during course of trial, petitioner was released on bail.
2. However, due to non-appearance of petitioner before the trial Court, his bail bonds were forfeited vide order dated 13.12.2017 and arrest warrant was issued as also separate proceedings under Section 446 Cr.P.C. were commenced. At this stage and after about eight years, petitioner moved an application under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C., seeking to convert his arrest warrant into bailable warrant but that application has been dismissed vide order impugned dated
17.07.2025.
3. During course of arguments, counsel for the petitioner has expressed that petitioner is doing a private job and he has to go outside Jaipur for his livelihood and is agreeable to surrender the petitioner before the Judicial Magistrate within a period of 15 days from today as also to deposit a cost of Rs.5,000/- in the government exchequer, apart from depositing the fine amount, so determined by
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-5261/2025] the Judicial Magistrate in the proceedings under Section 446 of Cr.P.C. and prays to release him on bail.
4. In that view of matter, without interfering with the impugned
order on merits, it is hereby observed that in case petitioner surrenders himself before the Judicial Magistrate within a period of 15 days from today and moves a bail application as also deposits the fine amount as determined by the trial Court under Section 446 of Cr.P.C. along with additional cost of Rs.5,000/-, his bail application may be considered by the trial Court, preferably on the same day and taking into consideration the nature of offences as well as the fact that earlier he has already been released on bail but he may put reasonable condition to ensure his presence in future. Till date of surrender, arrest warrant of petitioner shall not be executed.
5. However, it is made clear that petitioner shall cooperate with expeditious disposal and conclusion of trial of the present case, as early as possible.
6. Accordingly, the criminal misc. petition stands disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s) also stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /29