Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41004 (AP)

M VENKATA BHASKARARAO v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/33090/2025 · 2025-12-22

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010641162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33090/2025 Between: 1. M VENKATA BHASKARARAO, S/O NARASIMHAM AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.12-164, JANAPADU ROAD, PIDUGURALLA, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE PIDUGURALLA MUNICIPALITY, PIDUGURALLA, PALNADU DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE TOWN LAND SURVEY OFFICER, PIDUGURALLA MUNICIPALITY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents herein, more particularly Respondent No.2 Corporation herein in issuing Notice vide Roc.No.449/2025/G1 dated 15.11.2025, proposing to lay 300 MMDLA Dl K9 Pumping Line from Island Centre to Sai Baba Temple, Janapadu Road, Piduguralla by seeking to demolish 2 substantial portion of the shop belonging to the Petitioner situated in Door No. 12-201/1 of Janapadu Road, Piduguralla Municipality, Palnadu District without following the due process of law as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of the provisions of the AP Municipalities Act, 1965 and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and Consequently to set aside the proceedings in Notice vide Roc.No.449/2025/G1 dated 15.11.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2 Municipality herein and further direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein not to interfere with the possession of the Petitioner over property situated in Door No.12-201/1 of Janapadu Road, Piduguralla Municipality, Palnadu District and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the Notice issued vide Roc.No.449/2025/G1 dated 15.11.2025 by the Respondent No.2 and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 not to demolish or interfere with the possession of the Petitioner over property situated in Door No.12-201/1 of Janapadu Road, Piduguralla Municipality, Palnadu District and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appearing virtually submits that after filing the present Writ Petition, the respondent-authority has issued an endorsement dated 10.12.2025 and the petitioner intends to challenge the said proceedings. 2. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the notice dated 15.11.2025. As such, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. 3. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed, leaving it open for the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 23.12.2025 SCH 4 207 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.33090 of 2025 Date: 23.12.2025 SCH